Scotch & Politics

Recession... Bad in the Short Term, Good in the Long Term

January 22, 2008 by Mike W · 0 comments

I woke up this morning in the usual manner. Brewed some tea and fired up the computer… only to be greeted by these lovely headlines.

It appears we are staring down a recession.

This is obviously not a good thing… at least for the present and immediate future. Investments will stagnate, as will job growth. Inflation might increase, along with consumer pensiveness. I’m no economist so I won’t attempt to give any sort of analysis based on market models and crap like that. I will however state that this might be a good thing for America in the long term… politically and in turn, economically.

In recent history, economic fears lead to support for Democrats in our election. We, as a nation, tend to trust them with our domestic well-being. The prime example is the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, as a stagnating economy took down a rather popular George Bush. This cycle appears to be no different. Polls are showing that voters are becoming increasingly anxious about the economy and are voting with it as their most important issue… more so than the Iraq War. It just so happens that turnout in the Democratic primaries (and caucuses) is setting records. (And Republican turnout is down in roughly every state so far.)

If the economy continues to sink towards a recession, voters will once again turn towards the party they trust with taking care of the house. I don’t think they’ll be disappointed they did so, either. A Democrat in the White House means that the debacle of the Iraq War and its billions of dollars a day price tag will soon be ended. (The Seminal has a great piece on why Iraq War spending should be blamed in part for the recession.) The massive spending from the war can be refocused (hopefully not ALL of it – the government probably shouldn’t be spending THAT much money) on economic stimulus among other domestic priorities (health care, fully funded education reform, etc) that will positively affect our economy.

This shift in dynamic with regards to how we spend our money is desperately needed. For the past 7 years, we’ve been teetering on economic uncertainty. The Administration continually tells us how great the economy is doing, but only bases it on some economic indicators (the stock market index and unemployment, mostly). Many other indicators have shown signs of trouble… wage stagnation, weak and/or inconsistent job growth, inflation, and the trade deficit. Our country’s economy is in serious need of an Administration that can openly handle shaky economic times… not one that will get lost in futile foreign pursuits and relying on the good ‘ol private industry as the sole source of prosperity.

The looming recession seems to have woken up the American electorate to this Administration’s ignorance and arrogance (with regards to the economy… not just Iraq!). Let me be clear, I’m not rooting for a recession. Too many people lose jobs. Quality of life for many goes down. It’s a bad thing, and I think the mere threat of one has sufficiently arose the fears of the masses.

But if it does happen, it should lead to good things in the long term. I’ll paraphrase a classic Seinfeld quote… recession now, economic stabilization later.

0 comments Tags:

Democrats Growing a Spine?

November 21, 2007 by Mike W · 0 comments

What is it about Congressional Dems these days? Walking a tad more upright? Less use of those pesky kneepads? Well it seems that before our waking eyes, our good friends in legislative power have suddenly realized, “Hey, we’re in charge!” Just take a gander at the defiance House leadership is showing over a recently passed war funding bill that funds the war through February (roughly $50 billion) and sets conditions on redeployment:

A draft obtained by the Huffington Post reads: “Within 30 days after enactment of this Act, the President shall commence an immediate and orderly redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq.” Additionally, the draft states, “It is the sense of Congress that the war in Iraq should end as safely and quickly as possible and that our troops should be brought home.”

Amazing, right? The House says that they will not readdress war funding until next year, and if the President wants the supplemental funding he begged for, he’ll need to take it up with Senate Republicans who are sure to filibuster the crap out of the companion bill set to hit the Senate floor.

This picture of Chairman David Obey, purveyor of the government’s purse strings, says it all:

You want more proof of a spine. There are rumors abound that the House will be taking up the informally conferenced energy package (which should include a solid 15% RES standard and 35mpg CAFE standards) the week they return from Thanksgiving. If Speaker Pelosi can convince Harry Reid to stand strong on RES and give us a seriously good energy bill, then… oh my god… we may actually have a Congress we can be proud of.

0 comments Tags: